In a class that I took the Social Network in Online ID and Inter Memes (CMNS 2180_01), I watched the documentary “The Social Dilemma,” which examines how social media has disrupted our information ecosystem, leading to both helpful and harmful consequences. The film, along with insights from scholars like Jenkins, Hermida, Carr, and Wu, emphasizes that while social media aimed to foster connections, it has created a flawed information environment marked by echo chambers that reinforce existing beliefs. I will explain why I chose it to be my breadth in this portfolio with the following abstract.
Abstract:
Henry Jenkins argues in “Why Media Spreads” that participatory culture allows users to share and influence content, which democratizes information but also spreads harmful narratives. Hermida’s “Why We Share and Activism and Social Media” explores how platforms exploit our need for validation to drive engagement something digital journalists must be wary of. Nicholas Carr, in “What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains,” highlights the impact of constant connectivity on our attention spans and thinking, which poses challenges for journalism. Wu’s “Attention Merchants” aligns with the documentary’s view of how platforms monetize attention. For digital journalists, understanding the attention economy is crucial, as engagement metrics can sometimes compromise journalistic quality.
“The Social Dilemma” presents both challenges and opportunities for us as digital journalism students. It brings attention to ethical issues such as misinformation and bias while encouraging us to take responsibility as communicators. We must use our skills to promote ethical standards, foster critical thinking, and contribute to healthier public discourse.